Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Medicine in Drug Discovery ; : 100140, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1914816

ABSTRACT

Objectives The principal objectives of this review were to gather information on the potential role of antihistamines as anti-infective agents and to identify the gaps in research that have impaired their applicability in human health. Methods The literature search was carried using MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar and included all articles in English from January 1990 to May 2022. Results The literature search identified 12 antihistamines with activity against different pathogens. Eight molecules were second-generation antihistamines with an intrinsically lower tendency to cross the blood brain barrier, thereby with fewer side effects. Only five antihistamines had in vivo evaluations in rodents, while one study utilized a wax moth model to determine astemizole's anti-Cryptococcus sp. activity when combined with fluconazole. In vitro studies showed that clemastine was active against Plasmodium, Leishmania, and Trypanosoma, while terfenadine suppressed Candida spp. and Staphylococcus aureus growth. In vitro assays found that SARS-coV-2 was inhibited by doxepin, azelastine, desloratadine, and clemastine. Different antihistamines inhibited the Ebola virus (diphenhydramine, chlorcyclizine), Hepatitis C virus (chlorcyclizine), and Influenza virus (carbinoxamine, chlorpheniramine). Generally, in vitro activity (IC50) of antihistamines was in the low to sub-µM range, except for Staphylococcus epidermidis (loratadine MIC=50 µM) and SARS-coV-2 (desloratadine 70% inhibition at 20 µM). Conclusion Many antihistamine drugs show potential to progress to clinical trials based on in vitro data and the availability of toxicological and pharmacological data. However, the eventual need to use high antihistamine doses to achieve efficacy could be an additional problem. The overall lack of systematic preclinical trials has hampered the advancement of repurposed antihistamines for off-label evaluation. The low interest of pharmaceutical companies has to be counterbalanced through collaborations between research groups, granting agencies, and the government to support the needed clinical trials.

2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 14204, 2021 07 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1303784

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of 2019 caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is still rapidly spreading worldwide. Nucleic acid amplification serves as the gold standard method for confirmation of COVID-19 infection. However, challenges faced for diagnostic laboratories from undeveloped countries includes shortage of kits and supplies to purify viral RNA. Therefore, it is urgent to validate alternative nucleic acid isolation methods for SARS-CoV-2. Our results demonstrate that a concentrated viral lysis amplification buffer (vLAB) prepared with the nonionic detergent IGEPAL enables qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 by direct Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (dRT-PCR). Furthermore, vLAB was effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2. Since this method is inexpensive and no RNA purification equipment or additional cDNA synthesis is required, this dRT-PCR with vLAB should be considered as an alternative method for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Specimen Handling , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/genetics , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Virol Methods ; 296: 114227, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294029

ABSTRACT

The rapid detection of novel pathogens including SARS-CoV-2 necessitates the development of easy-to-use diagnostic tests that can be readily adapted and utilized in both clinical laboratories and field settings. Delay in diagnosis has facilitated the rapid spread of this novel virus throughout the world resulting in global mortality that will surpass 2.5 million people. Development of point-of-care diagnostic assays that can be performed in rural or decentralized health care centers to expand testing capacity is needed. We developed a qualitative test based on recombinase-polymerase-amplification coupled with lateral flow reading (RPA-LF) for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. The RPA-LF detected SARS-CoV-2 with a limit of detection of 35.4 viral cDNA nucleocapsid (N) gene copies/µL. Additionally, the RPA-LF was able to detect 0.25-2.5 copies/µL of SARS-CoV-2 N gene containing plasmid. We evaluated 37 nasopharyngeal samples using CDC's N3, N1 and N2 RT-real-time PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 as reference test. We found a 100 % concordance between RPA-LF and RT-qPCR reference test as determined by 18/18 positive and 19/19 negative samples. All positive samples had Ct values between 19-37 by RT-qPCR. The RPA-LF primers and probe did not cross react with other relevant betacoronaviruses such as SARS and MERS. This is the first isothermal amplification test paired with lateral flow developed for qualitative detection of COVID-19 allowing rapid viral detection and with prospective applicability in resource limited and decentralized laboratories.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/virology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/diagnosis , DNA Primers , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Humans , Point-of-Care Testing , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Recombinases/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL